My company is adding some new product lines in the next
couple of months. Preparatory to
starting production, I was entering all of the components and assemblies into
our inventory database, and creating the codes that will manipulate that
inventory. It was a task that
combined the need for exacting precision with mind numbing tedium.
Since I am fairly high up the food chain where I work, that
got me thinking about whether the task I was working on fit the category of
“highly skilled” work. I concluded
that it was. Although the actual
data entry was clerical in nature, navigating the systems and knowing what to
input raised the skill profile. I
certainly could not have off-loaded the task to a clerk. This led me to consider more generally
the question of what constitutes a skill?
My model for skills involves the interaction of three
separate components: education, talent, and experience. Education includes everything from
literacy and numeracy, through higher education. It also encompasses task specific training. This can range from simple job
instructions like “Push this button.
Then when the green light flashes, open the mold, pull the part out and
put it in the bin.” to brain surgery.
Experience is the second part of skills. Often times, training will cover the
simplest and most basic scenario for a given task, or set of tasks. Experience is what you get from the
myriad variations that arise over time.
Also, experience provides the repetition that pounds home and cements
the gains that training initiates.
The broader the range of experience you can build around a given task,
the higher your skill level can get.
Talent is the wild card for skill development. I could train with a coach for ten
years, and never get within a million miles of NBA caliber basketball
play. We’ve all seen bad actors,
and we’ve all seen actors who seem to effortlessly create memorable
characters. Talent is the
difference. But talent applies to
every field, not just athletics or creative work. I’ve seen factory maintenance mechanics who can take apart a
piece of equipment, figure out what is wrong, and solve a problem, all without
ever having worked on that particular piece of machinery. I’ve known plenty of other mechanics
who will work on equipment all day long, without ever actually solving the
problem, if they’ve never had that particular problem arise before. The difference in their work
performance is due to that ineffable something called talent.
Talent also encompasses personality traits. Part of my stock in trade is that I am
willing to accept responsibility for the work that other people do. A lot of people will not accept that
responsibility. That lack makes it
tough for them to manage other people.
What does any of this matter? Well, in an ever-changing economy, the only job security we
can muster is by constantly upgrading our skills. You can’t really do much about your talents. You either have them or you don’t. But you can know your talents. If you combine that knowledge with
ongoing education, and seek out an ever wider range of experiences, you can
keep increasing your skills throughout your career.
No comments:
Post a Comment