Thursday, April 30, 2009

The More Things Change...

Kenyan politics are a mess. The political parties are largely linked to tribal groups in the country, and partisanship is vastly fiercer than here. Last year arguments over a disputed election dissolved into violence that convulsed the country for weeks and left a number of people dead.

Eventually a coalition government was formed and the violence burned itself out. But the parties involved in the coalition are still squabbling, and there are fears that the tensions simmering under the surface could break out again.

In response to this situation, a number of women’s groups in Kenya have called for a one week sexual boycott. The idea is that until the men start talking to each other instead of fighting each other, their wives will withhold their favors.

Just thinking about this idea brings a smile to your face. The concept of women using their sexual power to bring the men in their lives to heel seems rife with comic possibilities. Maybe it has already been done. Wasn’t there a movie along those lines…?

Actually, the idea is much older than that. The same concept forms the plot of Lysistrata, an ancient Greek play, written by the playwright Aristophanes in the 411 BCE. In his version, the city-states of Sparta and Athens are at war. The women of both cities cut the men off until they agree to make peace. The play is, of course, a satire. By poking fun at the men and women of Sparta and Athens, Aristophanes points out the absurdity of our behavior in both sexual politics and state politics. At the heart of the story is an incongruous concept: sex makes us crazy, but that craziness can make us behave more sanely with regard to larger conflicts.

Twenty-four hundred years ago Aristophanes looked at people and politics, and came up with an idea that resonates through the ages, right up to the present day.

That is why I am a conservative. The raw material of society is people. The human animal. Our motivations and desires are the same as they were millennia ago. The institutions, mores, and practices that persist over time do so for a reason: they work. Why they work may not be obvious to us, but we hazard the foundations of society when we make ill-considered alterations to institutions that have developed and held up over long periods.

I believe the current mania for “change” is ill-considered. History is littered with the wreckage of attempted utopian schemes. Until you change people, you better be careful when trying to change society. It has been over two millennia, and we are still waiting.

Even with a filibuster proof majority in the Senate, you cannot repeal the Law of Unintended Consequences.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Waterboarding and other unpleasantness

Some thirty years ago, I was a cadet attending ROTC summer training camp in Ft. Benning, Georgia. One day of the training was dedicated to adventure training. Rappeling, zip lines, biting the heads off chickens. That sort of thing.

At one point during the day, a group of cadets sat down with one of the training sergeants, a grizzled old Viet Nam vet. Somehow the discussion turned to the subject of questioning prisoners of war. The sergeant said that during the war, they would take two blindfolded VC up in a helicopter and start questioning them. Then they would tie a rope around one of them and throw him out of the chopper. The other would hear the screams as the man was pushed out, which was enough to get him to start answering questions.

Then the veteran said “If you really want information, you take the 9 volt battery out of the walkie-talkie handset, and press both terminals against the man’s temple. Bzzt! When he gets finished singing God Bless America, he’ll tell you anything you want to know.”

At this point he stopped and looked at the group of college students surrounding him, and saw the absolutely shocked faces. It was silent for a moment. Then, with dead sincerity, the sergeant said “That’s not torture. That’s interrogation.”

With the current media pyrotechnics about the Bush administrations “advanced interrogation” policies, it is worth noting this is not the first time we, as a society, have attempted to define the issue of what constitutes torture, and what is merely tough questioning. I think the question does not lend itself to bright and shining boundaries.

Pulling someone’s fingernails off with pliers? Yes, that’s torture. Sleep deprivation? Maybe. Now we’re in the grey area. Making a suspect wear women’s underwear, or having a woman lead him around with a dog leash? Please, you pay extra for that in Vegas.

But in struggling with these issues as policy is set, I have a suggestion. A modest proposal. Call it a version of sauce for the gander.

Have your attorneys draft memos outlining the limits of what is acceptable. This is just what the Bush administration did. Then take those same attorneys and subject them to the same interrogation techniques they proposed. If they say waterboarding is legal, waterboard ‘em. If they say exposure to cold is legal, stick ‘em in a meat locker. At the end of the process, is they still sign off on the memos, you have your policy.

Think of it as a new version of the Golden Rule. Not, “Do unto others as you would have done to yourself.” Not, “Do unto others as they would do unto you, but do it first.” No, not even the classic, “Whoever has the gold makes the rules.”

This version of the Golden Rule is “Don’t do anything unto others that you wouldn’t be willing to have done to yourself.”

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Green Shoots and Other Images

Last week, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said he detected “green shoots” among the economic indicators he tracks. A nice metaphor for seeing signs of recovery from the current economic malaise. Beautifully timed to coincide with the annual rebirth of springtime.

At my company, we are also seeing some “green shoots” of our own. After dropping to a level less than half of what it was a year ago, orders from customers have rebounded somewhat. March financial results put us into the black for the year to date, April’s results will be better still, and the sales forecast for May/June is comfortable, if not stupendous.

It is infinitely less stressful to be focused on how much profit we can make, as opposed to having concerns over whether the month will show a profit or a loss. We have shifted over to the positive problem of “How do we make shipments on time with the resources we have?” as opposed to the negative problem of “Who is the next person to get laid off?” I’ve even had to call a few people back off layoff.

My problem is that I can’t confine myself to the springtime “green shoots” metaphor. I come back to other metaphors. Grimmer metaphors.

“We’re not out of the woods yet.” “The other shoe has yet to drop.” “The light at the end of a tunnel is an oncoming train.” “The economy is executing a head fake. It gets you moving one way, then whammo, it turns and goes the other.” “It’s always darkest just before it really goes pitch black.”

My gut feeling is that we are going to hear more bad news before the economy really recovers. So I am keeping cost controls in place, eliminating unnecessary expenses, and watching every hour of overtime like a hawk. I would say “plan for the worst, and hope for the best,” but I think hope is for suckers.

Some say the glass if half full. Some say the glass is half empty. I say the glass has a crack, and the water is running out.

Maybe that's why I don't get invited out much.

Sunday, April 19, 2009

General Growth Shrinks Down to Nothing

General Growth, the second largest shopping mall operator in America, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last week. General Growth had grown through a series of acquisitions over the years. The largest of these was an $11 billion buyout of the Rouse Company in 2004.

GG had paid for these acquisitions through the mechanism of taking on ever increasing loads of debt. At the time of their bankruptcy filing, they had over $27 billion in outstanding loans.

The mall operator was taken down by two interlinked factors related to the recession. First, the current economic downturn has caused a shake out in the retailing industry. Merchants are closing stores, leaving blank fronts inside the malls. Unrented spaces mean that the cash flow available to pay debt is reduced.

The immediate cause of the bankruptcy was the general credit crunch. Banks were simply unwilling to roll over loans that had come due from the real estate operator. Faced with demands for cash, the management of General Growth threw up their hands and declared “Game Over.”

First of all, who lends money to a mall operator named General Growth? The mall industry has been shrinking for years. Malls are based on the concept that you park your car and stroll through the mall to do your shopping. Overweight Americans don’t want to stroll. They want to drive up to one store, get what they want (note the distinction between get what you want and get what you need), and then get back in the car and drive to the next big box retailer. “I had to drive around that parking lot four times before a good parking spot opened up. It’s a good thing gas prices have dropped since last year.”

I’m no retail genius, but even I know that the mall industry has been shrinking. It would be like loaning money to a company called Smoking Crack, Inc. “Sure, that sounds like a great investment!”

But it is even more amazing that the managers of the company bet the stockholder’s money on a strategy that included piling on debt until they were unable to get it refinanced. Without spectacular amounts of leverage, the returns in the mall business might not have been great, but they sure would have been better than being wiped out.

So, another company build on leverage bites the dust. And the trend for 2009 continues…

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Tax Season is Over

The ides of April are behind us. The gust of wind that stirred the hair on the back of your neck yesterday was the collective sigh of relief from all the tax filers sending in their tax returns just ahead of the deadline. Following that was a minor breeze coming from the paid tax preparers who are standing down after frantic activity of the last few weeks. Tax season is over.

When I signed on with H & R Block to do taxes last year, I figured that getting customers was the easiest part of the business. After all, the only service with a comparable level of built-in demand is the funeral home industry. Taxes are inevitable for everybody, right?

Well, taxes may be inevitable, but paying someone else to do them for you is not. H & R Block reported that through March 15, the number of returns prepared were down 6.2% versus the same period a year ago. The news was even worse at Jackson Hewitt, the second largest tax preparation chain. They are forecasting a drop of 12% for the number of returns prepared for the 2009 tax season.

USA Today ran a story on this with the headline “Downturn has taxpayers filing solo.” The implication is that the recession has driven more tax filers to using at home software for their taxes to save money.

I think trying to tie this trend to the current recession is a lot of hogwash. More people are filing taxes using home computers because it is cheaper and easier. That is an attractive proposition all the time, whether there is a recession or not.

When I prepare someone’s taxes at an H & R Block office, I have to be paid (not bloody much pay, but money does change hands). Also, rent on the bricks and mortar office continues all year round, even though tax season only lasts three months. HRB maintains the computers the paid preparers work on as well.

With the home software, the cost of producing another copy of the program is a tiny fraction of those costs. If you use the on-line version of the tax software, even those costs are eliminated. It’s no surprise that the price of home preparation kicks the crap out of the price of a paid preparer. And you can do your taxes any time, day or night, in your underwear, should you so desire.

As home computers with high-speed internet connections have become ubiquitous, more and more people are choosing the less expensive, more convenient home tax prep over paid services. The new model of computers and internet is hollowing out the market for tax preparers. This is the same process that killed the travel agent business. With the exception of cruise specialists, there are no more travel agents, and there used to be at least one in every small town.

Is tax preparation going to the same route to extinction?

Probably not. The difference is that not everyone flies on the airlines, but everyone has to file a tax return. They also have to die, but that’s a different story.

Even though tax law is getting more complicated, doing your taxes yourself is getting easier as the software gets better, particularly if your taxes aren’t particularly complicated. This means that for paid tax services, the middle of the market is getting carved out.

Two groups are left over: early season filers and late season filers. The early season filers tend to be lower income. They are either computer illiterate, or they want access to the financial products that tax prep firms can offer (refund anticipation loans). The late season filers will be the people with complicated taxes (farms, partnerships, business owners). The late filers will need more tax expertise and judgement applied than they can get from a computer program.

The total market for tax preparation services will continue to shrink. But even if they close offices, the services will still have to cover a lot of overhead. I will predict that even as the industry shrinks, the prices charged will continue to increase. Of course, raising prices will accelerate customers switching to the do it yourself model.

I may do taxes with H & R Block again next year. But I wouldn’t buy their stock as a long term investment.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Is it safe to go back in the water?

Last week Wells Fargo announced record earnings for the first quarter of 2009. The stock market soared on the news, and reports started to circulate that the worst was over for this recession.

No so fast!

Wells Fargo’s results were driven by fees from a wave of refinancing. The refi boom came about because the Fed has dropped interest rates to the floor. Mortgage rates have followed. As a result, people who could have been refinancing existing mortgages to take advantage of the lower rates.

Everyone who refinances has to pay fees to the bank for handling the transaction. This is great for the bank, but it is a short term phenomena. Mortgage rates are sitting at about 4.5% right now. They aren’t going to go much lower, if any. We’ve got about one quarter more of refinancing, then everyone who wants to take advantage of the new lower rates will have done so, and the fee income is going to dry up again.

The real issue is whether Wells Fargo has finished writing off all the bad loans in their real estate portfolio. Since real estate prices are continuing to fall, I’m guessing that more bad news is going to come out. After all, WF posted a loss in the 4th quarter of last year almost equal to what they earned this quarter.

We’re not out of the woods yet.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Depression? What Depression?

My latest bedtime reading is a book called The Coming Great Depression by Harry S. Dent. I keep it on my nightstand, and read a few pages every evening before I go to sleep.

The Coming Great Depression? Sweet dreams, buddy!

Dent is primarily a demographer, and he uses demographic trends as a tool for forecasting the economy. His major point is that there is a strong correlation between birthrates and asset prices (stocks and housing), with a forty year time lag. Put another way, if the birthrate goes up this year, in forty years the stock market will go up as well.

The logic behind this observed correlation is simple. People in their late thirties and early forties are at their peak productive years in the workforce. Also, those are the years of peak consumption, as people raise families, move up to bigger houses, spend on their children’s education, etc.

The primary prediction of the book is that the current downturn is only the start of a longer down cycle. The down cycle will play out over the next 10 to 15 years. The bottom of the trough will occur in 2012 or 2013, with the next boom cycle starting in 2022.

After the post WWII baby boom generation, birth rates fell and we had what is called the baby bust generation that followed. What Dent calls the Echo Boom generation was born in the eighties, a time of increasing birth rates. The dearth of baby busters will cause the drop off in the economy, and the Echo Boomers will ignite the next growth cycle as they hit their peak productive and consuming years.

The author throws in a lot of other cycle analysis to support his arguments. He mentions commodity cycles, technology cycles, political cycles and others. The periodicity of these cycles range from 18 to 250 years in length. I’m not sure I buy the additional arguments. I mean, please. A 250 year cycle that he can predict will bottom out in the next ten years? It just sounds like looking for arguments to support a predetermined prediction.

The central demographic argument is compelling, however.

If we are headed into an economic trough that will last 10 to 15 years, than equity investing is a losing game until the next up cycle starts. Better to focus on building up your cash position and acquire high rated bonds.

The good news for me is that if Dent is right, the next upswing in asset prices will occur just as I am getting ready for retirement. A rising market will fund my golden years.

Of course, Dent also wrote a book called Dow 32,000 a few years back, at the height of the tech boom, and we know how that turned out.

I’ll take it all with a grain of salt.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Crisis? What crisis?

A funny thing happened last week. I bought a car.

A small sport utility, actually. I leased the vehicle three years ago, and since it had low milage, I bought it when the lease expired. Plunked a couple thou down to keep the payment low and signed up for a 24 month payout.

Okay, you're still waiting for the comedy part to kick in, I know.

The funny part was how easy it was to get the loan. I walked into the dealership, signed some papers, and bang-zoom, drove off with the car. They'll send me the first statement at the end of this month.

Hahaha...wait, no that still isn't funny.

All right, so maybe it wasn't funny, at least not in the ha ha sense. More like it was funny in the peculiar sense.

You see, I keep reading about how the credit market is frozen up. I keep reading about how "we need to get the banks out loaning money again." But I didn't have a problem getting a loan. From where I'm standing, there is no problem borrowing money.

In all fairness, the interest rate was higher than I wanted to pay. My last car loan was five years ago, and at that time the best rate was 5%. This loan was at 7 percent. Given that the Fed funds rate is lower than it was five years ago, my new car loan is actually more profitable for the bank than the old loan was.

Also, I have a sterling credit rating, and I put a chunk of money down on the transaction. The odds of this loan going nipples up are vanishingly remote.

So maybe the problem is not that the banks aren't loaning money. Maybe the problem is that the banks aren't loaning money to poor credit risks.

Can you blame them? After all, it was loaning money to people who couldn't afford to pay it back that got the banks in trouble in the first place.